NNKL.COM
welcome to my space
X
Search:  
 HOME   Weather Research Center out of Houston Texas 2007 forecast
Weather Research Center out of Houston Texas 2007 forecast
Published by: mike 2009-01-08
Welcome to:nnkl.com

  • http://www.wxresearch.org/press/2007huroutmar15.pdf

    http://www.wxresearch.com/outlook/2007out.jpg


  • Kind of reminds me of AccuWx's forecast last year:

    http://vortex.accuweather.com/adc2004/pub/images/promos/hurr2006/hurrisk.jpg

    (Notice the one place where a hurricane did hit was in the "Low" area.)


  • So what makes them so interested specifically in the eastern Gulf I wonder?

    Typical strike probability as provided by NHC: http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G12.html

    Honestly, what makes Georgia and NC so much more likely than Florida at this forecast time, I haven't a clue.

    SST anomalies would be a guess as to their reasoning, http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/hurricane/12wksst.html
    But that shows that while there is a slight warm anomaly off Louisiana, anomalies of such size don't usually persist very long.

    Last year had quite healthy sea-surface temperatures (2nd warmest on record in the basin I believe, behind 05) and below average shear, yet produced only an average year. Relating it to El Nino is a common thing to do, and that's fine, but it just goes to show that dynamically the setup can be there and nothing happen. And while a La Nina is forecast/appears to be emering, and a stronger LN becoming more likely, http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso_disc_mar2006/ is all I have to say.
    And still the question remains, why those regions???
    Is there some weak statistical indicators by region?

    Or you can play Accuweather, pick regions that'll generate concern/large attention, and forget about it before the season dies away. And, yes, it was hilarious to see Alberto getting hurricane warnings right here in the Florida Big Bend where they forecasted the lowest chances. (It never reached hurricane strength, though).

    I have to stick with what Jim Leonard discussed a few threads back about the setup of trough/ridge patterns. In an NHC talk here last week, I believe the only dynamical (as opposed to statistical methods like ENSO) negative were in velocity potential anomaly and upper-level temperatures/stability. From my what weak attention I paid most of last tropical season, the SAL wasn't that big of a player (slightly more typical numbers of storms formed out towards the Cape Verdes than the surprisingly huge lack of storms out there in 05). While outbreaks occurred as in any year, I don't remember anything too overbearing. But like I said, didn't pay a TON of attention.
    TOP STORIES | KHOU.com | News for Houston, Texas::
    HFD responded to a fire at a southwest Houston assisted living center Tuesday morning. Texas gets 'C-' for roads, bridges. The report card is out on the
    http://www.khou.com/topstories/vitindex.html
    HOME

    We'll see what happens. It looks like it'll be an active year with recent trends and the lack of El Nino, but no one can bet the farm on this.

    Shane


  • I wouldn't take this forecast for much either. It does look like they actually mean 7, which is refreshing considering everyone is quite close to the Gray/NOAA predictions usually (makes me wonder how much of the forecast is statistics and how much subjective!).

    They forecast apparently using sunspot cycles as well as global wave pattern apparently, modeled well into the future.

    And here is what their report from 1999 claims:
    "Meteorologist at the Center have been using the OCSI since 1985 to make annual hurricane outlooks. Before 1999, the only two years when a storm did not make landfall in the section of the coast with the highest risk were in 1987 and 1992. But like this year these years did have storms in the second highest at risk coast line. So for the last15 years that have been forecasted only three did not verify with the highest probability. There for 12 out 15 years did verify for 80% correct."

    The problem is that that year, as this year, they forecasted the Al-La area highest. Based upon their own climatology values, strike is 60% likely in Al-La, and 70% likely in West Florida. And they obviously missed last year. And they beneficially don't have any results for the past 7 years available online. They appear to be well within the margin for error, and have not proven any skill as of yet in determining location.
    A fact I would tend to believe most seasonal forecasts still trend towards.

    Shane


  • Think that they mean 17 storms ?





  • I Am a Sinner – What About You?
    Global Sourcing and Supplier Online by Dylan

    You are looking at:nnkl.com's Weather Research Center out of Houston Texas 2007 forecast, click nnkl.com to home
  • ernie s new website
  • randy williams wing chun
  • randy williams seminar
  • hfy workshop in dayton oh
  • does anyone else have this concept in their w c
  • wing chun muesum
  • knowledge understanding vs skill ability
  • wing chun warrior review
  • anybody been here
  • long and short range wing chun
  • congratulations charles jones
  • wing chun used in star wars clone wars animated cartoon
  • basic kicks
  • how do you practice wc hard or soft
  •  
  • wt chisao tournament vids
  • ufc mma fighter
  • new dvd s from sifu gary lam
  • workout in san fran
  • so i just started cross tarining
  • gloves
  • alan gibson any uk guys out there
  • working the heavy bag
  • zero inch punch
  • female boxer dies
  • koo lo futshan yip white crane
  • escrima and wing chun
  • question about wing chun school in tampa
  •  Homepage | Add to favorites | Contact us | Exchange links | LOGIN | Site map | 
    Copyright© 2008 nnkl.com        Site made:CFZ