NNKL.COM
welcome to my space
X
Search:  
 HOME   The Laws of Men & Love - A Laymans Philosophical Analysis of the Law
The Laws of Men & Love - A Laymans Philosophical Analysis of the Law
Published by: smith 2008-12-02
Welcome to:nnkl.com


         I know a lawyer, and today he said to me, ?he law is everything. It is society.?When I heard this, my heart told me, ?hat is not true.?But I didn't know why. When I got home that night, I went to sleep at midnight. I woke up at 4AM, and I remembered what the lawyer said, and what my heart said. My mind searched my heart and the world for the answer, and this is what I found: The law does two things only: to limit what you can do to other people, and to establish the minimum of what you must do to other people. The law lives only in these two places - but love does not exist in either of these places. For example, I can not say bad things about you, steal from you, hit you, or kill you ?even if I think it will make me happy. These are the limits that the law sets as to what I can do to other people (in law books, maybe they are called restrictive laws). There are also laws that force me to do certain things. If I am a man, I have to pay taxes and serve in the army, and if I am a father, I have to give food to my son ?even if it doesn't make me happy. These are the minimums the law sets as to what I have to do to other people (in law books, maybe they are called obligatory laws). But more than that, I don't have to do: I don't have to donate money to the government, or buy toys for my son if I don't want to. The restrictive laws can be simplified into one rational principle: ?ou can do whatever you want as long as you don't hurt other people.?This is actually the way most people view their happiness and freedom. You are free to do whatever makes you happy as long as it doesn't get in the way of other people. The obligatory laws can also be simplified into one rational principle: ?ou have to do a few certain things to certain other people, but more than that you don't have to do.?This is actually the way most people view their responsibilities. Combine these two ways, and you see that this is how most people live their life ?how they do the things they want, and how they do the things they don't want to do. According to the law, being a good citizen means balancing the pursuit of your own happiness with fulfilling your responsibilities to others. But if I do nothing to you, that is okay too. When other people say bad things about you, or steal from you, hit you, or kill you, I can ignore you and it is not against the law. If I don't care about you, if I let you suffer and be unhappy, that is not against the law. This is how many people use the word ?espect? I won't bother you, so don't bother me. But this is not love. The same is true for the minimums: I have to pay taxes and serve in the army, but I do not have to love my country. I have to give food to my son, but I do not have to love him. The law does not teach you how to love or to have a heart ?or tell you that you should have a heart. I can be a law-abiding citizen and break no laws, and yet have no heart. According to the law, it is legal to not care, to not love. That is why listening to the law and the principles of reason teach you only how to think about yourself. Most of it tells you what you cannot take from other people. I cannot take your money, body, life, or privacy. When you take too much, the law speaks and comes alive, and seeks to punish you. But the law does not teach you how to share with other people: if I am nice to you, say good things about you, help you, give you money, or love you, the law does not reward you. When you give more than is required by law, the law is quiet and does nothing - it is dead. The law does not exist in the places of love. When the heart is dead, the law is alive, and when the heart is alive, the law is dead. The heart exists in places beyond the law. Listen only to the law, and your heart will die. Listen to your heart and the hearts of others, and give, and your heart will live. Happiness and love cannot exist when two people try to take from each other, or even if only one person gives and the other takes. The result is court ?in fact, any time when someone goes to court, it's usually because they want to take something from somebody who doesn't want to give it. Happiness and love exist when two people or two sides give and go beyond the two rational principles of law ?when they try to give and do more than is required. Two people who give stay outside of court, because they go beyond the laws of men ?for they live from the heart through the laws of love.

Elizabethan Clothing Law for Men::
Visit this site dedicated to providing information about Elizabethan Clothing Law for Men.Fast and accurate details and facts about the history of
http://www.elizabethan-era.org.uk/elizabethan-clothing-laws-men.htm
HOME
Of men, hogs, and law: if natural law does not permit us::
IN 1854, in perhaps the most moving and compelling exhibition of natural-law reasoning in all political history, Abraham Lincoln began: Equal justice.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-11860848.html
HOME
'A Nation of Laws, Not Men'? Bush Administration Suspends Laws ::
Today, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced that he is imposing a blanket waiver of environmental and land management laws
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20080401/pl_usnw/_a_nation_of_laws__not_men___bush_administration_suspends_laws_along_u_s__mexico_border_for_unnecessary_and_destructive_border_
HOME



I Am a Sinner – What About You?
Global Sourcing and Supplier Online by Dylan

You are looking at:nnkl.com's The Laws of Men & Love - A Laymans Philosophical Analysis of the Law , click nnkl.com to home
  • do mileage award tickets count towards mvp status
  • aggressive pimping of as visa
  • from today s usa today
  • when will as admit is was a mistake to hire menzies aviation
  • watercooler i heard that we will start charging for coffee and soda
  • question about upgrade on as
  • gang bangers in as cargo holds
  • best side of plane for view from seattle to juneau
  • alaska pulling out of iad
  • yet another depressurization issue
  • another gold upg coupon story
  • qx getting 2 used q400s
  • claiming miles on dl flights
  •  
  • as board considers retiring 26 from md 8x fleet
  • as1 dca sea diverted to iad today why
  • lax ff lounge questions
  • impressed with as service
  • sea co as dl or nw s lounge
  • help with sea anc flights
  • booking hnl to sea and back on alaska website
  • gold coast travel partners
  • another as flight turns back due to depressurization
  • really tentative dates for 2006 mvpg luncheons
  • why i do not fly alaska airlines
  • time to split puw lws flights
  • tesoro s free fillin
  • nw discontinues sea transfer shuttle effective march 1 2006
  •  Homepage | Add to favorites | Contact us | Exchange links | LOGIN | Site map | 
    Copyright© 2008 nnkl.com        Site made:CFZ